欢迎访问《高校地质学报》官方网站,今天是
分享到:

J4

• 文章目录 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂西清江两水利枢纽坝址区地震危险性对比分析

吴树仁 晏同珍 梅应堂 徐瑞喜   

  1. 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所
  • 收稿日期:1996-06-20 修回日期:1996-06-20 出版日期:1996-06-20 发布日期:1996-06-20

THE CPMPARISON ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC RISK IN TWO DAM SITES FOR HYDRO-JUNCTION PROJECTS OF QINJIANG RIVER IN THE WESTERN HUBEI

Wu Shuren1, Yan Tongzhen2, Mei Yingtang3, Xu Ruchun3   

  1. 1. Institute of geomechanics, CAGS, Beijing, 100081; 2. China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074; 3. Survey institute of three Gorges, water conservancy Committee for the Yangtzae River, Yichang, 443003
  • Received:1996-06-20 Revised:1996-06-20 Online:1996-06-20 Published:1996-06-20

摘要: 本文在研究清江流域及外围区域地震地质条件和地震分布规律的基础上,划分了1、2个潜在震源区,并确定其相应的地震活动性参数,同时探讨区域地震烈度衰减规律及各潜在震源区对隔河岩和水布垭两坝址的影响烈度、进而复泊松模型,评价两坝址的地震危险性,获得了丙坝址不同期限内的地面峰值加速度及其相应的超越概率。根据对比分析,水布垭坝址的地震危险性比隔洒岩坝址小。

Abstract: On the basis of the study of seismic geological environment and seismic distributive regularity in Qingjiang river basin and its neighbouring regions, 12 potential seismic source regions and their parameters of seismic activity were determined, The reduction regularity of regional seismic intensity and seismic influence intensity of the potential seismic source regions on the two dam sites of Geheyan and Shuibuya were analyzed. The seismic risk of the two dam sites were assessed by using Poission model, and ground were obtained. According to the comparison analysis of seismic risk fro the two dam sites, safety factor of Shuibuya dam site is larger than that of Geheyan dam site.