Welcome to Geological Journal of China Universities ! Today is
Share:

Geological Journal of China Universities ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 37-46.DOI: 10.16108/j.issn1006-7493.2022071

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Physical Parameters of Shale on CO2 Storage Capacity with Different Mechanisms

YIN Shuguo1,YANG Guodong1*,FENG Tao1,MA Xin2,CAO Wei3,HUANG Mian1,GUO Tianqing1   

  1. 1. College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China;
    2. Center for Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology of China Geological Survey, Baoding 071051, China;
    3. Institute of Geology of Pudong Oil Production Plant, Sinopec Zhongyuan Oilfield, Puyang 457001, China
  • Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-02-20

Abstract: CO2 enhanced shale gas recovery (CO2-ESGR) can not only increase CH4 production, but also store CO2. In order to investigate the effects of physical parameters of shale on CO2 sequestration mechanisms, a dual-porosity, dual-permeability homogeneous model was established using CMG-GEM based on the shale of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin. This study analyzed the effects of vertical permeability to horizontal permeability ratio (Kv/Kh), water saturation and porosity of shale on CO2 storage capacity with different mechanisms in CO2-ESGR. Moreover, 27 sets of orthogonal tests were designed to investigate the extent of influence of these three factors by range analysis. The results showed that Kv/Kh increase in the range of 0.1 to 1 leads to enhanced CO2 storage capacity with different mechanisms, and the maximum storage capacity can increase by 69.96%, of which the adsorption storage capacity can increase by 97.96%. Water saturation increase in the range of 0-0.9 induces the total CO2 storage to show an increase first and then a decrease. The maximum storage capacity can reduce by 67.12%, of which the dissolved storage capacity can reduce by 83.35%, with the largest range fluctuation. Shale porosity increase in the range of 0.1- 0.99 leads to the reduction of total CO2 storage capacity, and the maximum storage capacity can reduce by 95.38%, of which the adsorption storage capacity can reduce by 99.99%. Range analysis showed that water saturation has the largest impact on the amount of structural trapping, residual trapping and solubility trapping, porosity has the largest impact on total CO2 storage capacity and adsorption storage capacity, and Kv/Kh has the least effect on CO2 storage capacity with different mechanisms. For CO2 storage in shale reservoirs, shale with low water saturation, low-porosity and high Ky/Kh ratio is suggested to obtain the maximum storage capacity.

Key words: CO2 geological storage, shale, physical parameter, sequestration mechanism, numerical simulation

CLC Number: