欢迎访问《高校地质学报》官方网站,今天是
分享到:

高校地质学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 669-687.DOI: 10.16108/j.issn1006-7493.2022033

• 南海海洋地质、构造与油气资源专辑 • 上一篇    下一篇

南海北部珠江口盆地珠一坳陷西江凹陷与陆丰凹陷差异裂陷过程定量分析

马兵山1,漆家福2*,王俊怀3,能 源4,于福生2,陈玮常5,邬光辉1,葛家旺1   

  1. 1. 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院,成都 610500;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京) 地球科学学院,北京 102200;
    3. 中国石油 新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院,克拉玛依 834000;
    4. 中国石油大学(北京) 克拉玛依校区石油学院,克拉玛依 834000;
    5. 集宁师范学院 地理科学学院,乌兰察布 013658
  • 出版日期:2022-10-20 发布日期:2022-10-20

Quantitative Analysis of Differential Rifting Process in the Xijiang and Lufeng Sags of the Zhu 1 Depression, Pearl River Mouth Basin, Northern South China Sea

MA Bingshan1,QI Jiafu2*,WANG Junhuai3,NENG Yuan4,YU Fusheng2,CHEN Weichang5,#br# WU Guanghui1,GE Jiawang1#br#   

  1. 1. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; 2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay 834000, China;
    4. College of Petroleum, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China;
    5. College of Geography, Jining Normal University, Ulanqab 012000, China
  • Online:2022-10-20 Published:2022-10-20

摘要: 西江凹陷和陆丰凹陷均位于南海北部珠江口盆地珠一坳陷,前者盆地结构为两条NE向铲式边界断层控制的近对称地堑,后者表现为6条弯曲主干断层控制的“两洼夹一隆”构造格局。文章运用三维地震资料,在盆地结构、断裂系统描述的基础上,选取了两个凹陷共8条地震—地质剖面进行平衡剖面恢复,计算两幕裂陷阶段盆地伸展量、拆离深度等定量参数,并据此分析二者差异裂陷演化过程及与区域构造演化之间的联系。两个凹陷在新生代均经历裂陷一幕、二幕以及裂后拗陷阶段,其中每幕裂陷又可细分为早、晚两个亚幕。西江和陆丰凹陷的裂陷演化具有时空差异性。从裂陷一幕到二幕,二者伸展量都具有随时间减小的一般特征,其中西江凹陷的伸展量随时间持续减小,在裂陷二幕晚期仍具有较大伸展量,而陆丰凹陷在裂陷二幕早期伸展量略有升高,但在晚期伸展量急剧减小,其减弱程度远大于西江凹陷。两个凹陷的拆离深度都具有随时间逐渐加深的特征。在裂陷一幕早、晚亚幕,陆丰凹陷的拆离深度略大于西江凹陷。在裂陷二幕早、晚亚幕,西江凹陷的平均拆离深度由约8 km增长至9 km左右,而陆丰凹陷的平均拆离深度由约8 km跳跃式增长至约35 km。盆地的几何结构、断裂系统以及伸展量和拆离深度变化特征均反映陆丰凹陷在裂陷二幕晚期受热沉降作用或提前结束裂陷阶段,而西江凹陷在裂陷二幕之后结束裂陷作用。研究区的裂陷阶段自东向西逐渐结束可能受控于东北次海盆的扩张及南海的自东向西渐进式扩张。区域板块构造演化提供了珠江口盆地沿其轴向向SW方向伸展作用增强的差异伸展环境。该研究所揭示的盆地裂陷演化差异性对认识珠江口盆地的裂陷时限的时空分布和差异裂陷演化都具有重要的意义,也对认识南海北部大陆边缘裂陷过程提供重要的定量数据约束。

关键词: 多幕裂陷, 水平伸展量, 拆离深度, 构造差异性, 珠江口盆地

Abstract: The Xijiang and Lufeng Sags are located in the Zhu 1 Depression of the Pearl River Mouth Basin in the northern South China Sea; the former displays a nearly symmetric graben controlled by NE-striking listric boundary faults, while the latter has the “two sag sandwiching one high” tectonic framework controlled by six curved major faults. The structure and rifting evolution show obvious spatial and temporal differences. In this paper, based on the three-dimensional seismic data, basin structure and geometry of fault system were descripted, a total of 8 seismic-geological sections in the two sags were selected for balanced section restoration, and quantitative parameters (e.g. horizontal displacement and depth-to-detachment) during the two rifting stages were calculated. The evolution process and their differences of the two rifts were further analyzed and the relationship with regional tectonic evolution was discussed. In the Cenozoic, the study area experienced the first (period of the Wenchang Formation) and second (period of the Enping Formation) phases of rifting and the subsequent Late Oligocene-Quaternary post-rifting stage. Each rifting phase can be subdivided into early and late sub-phases. The rifting evolution of the Xijiang and Lufeng Sags has temporal and spatial differences. From the first to second phase of rifting, the horizontal displacement of the study area has the general characteristics of decreasing with time. The horizontal displacement of the Xijiang Sag continues to decrease with time, and it still contains large displacement in the late sub-phase of the second phase, while it is slightly increased in the early sub-stage of the second phase in the Lufeng Sag. The degree of extension in the late sub-phase is much weaker in the Lufeng Sag than that in the Xijiang Sag. The depth-to-detachment of the two sags has the characteristics of deepening with time. In the early and late sub-phases of the first phase, the depth-to-detachment of the Lufeng Sag is slightly deeper than that of the Xijiang Sag. In the early and late subphases of the second phase, the average depth-to-detachment of the Xijiang Sag increases from ~8 km to ~9 km, while the average detachment depth of the Lufeng Sag jumps from ~8 km to ~35 km. The geometric structure, fault system, horizontal displacement and depth-to-detachment of the study area indicate that the Lufeng Sag was subjected to thermal subsidence in the late sub-phase of the second rifting phase and probably ended the rifting stage earlier, while the rifting of the Xijiang Sag ended after the second rifting phase. The rifting of the study area gradually ending from east to west may be controlled by the seafloor spreading of the Northeast Sub-basin of the South China Sea and the gradual westward seafloor spreading of the South China Sea. The regional plate tectonic evolution also provides the Pearl River Mouth Basin with a differential extension environment with enhanced extension in the SW direction. The differential rifting evolution of the study area is of great significance for understanding the temporal and spatial distribution of the rift time and differential rift evolution in the Pearl River Mouth Basin, and also provides important quantitative constraint for understanding the rifting process in the northern continental margin of the South China Sea. 

Key words: multiphase rifting, horizontal displacement, depth to detachment, differential tectonic evolution, Pearl River Mouth Basin

中图分类号: