欢迎访问《高校地质学报》官方网站,今天是
分享到:

J4 ›› 2010, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 388-396.

• 其他学科来稿 • 上一篇    下一篇

琼东南盆地断裂活动性定量计算及其发育演化模式

尹新义, 任建业, 裴健翔, 雷超   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学 资源学院,武汉 430074;2. 中国地质大学 构造与油气资源教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430074;
    3. 中海石油(中国)有限公司 湛江分公司,湛江 524057
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-19 修回日期:2010-06-01 出版日期:2010-09-20 发布日期:2010-09-20
  • 作者简介:尹新义,1984年生,男,硕士研究生,主要从事盆地分析方面工作; E-mail: yxy06004126@126.com
  • 基金资助:

      博士点基金(20070491004);国家自然科学基金(40672089);973项目(2007CB41170502);国家科技重大专项
    (20082x05025-002)

Quantitative Calculation on Fault Activity and Fault Propagation Mechanism
in Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea

 YIN Xin-Yi, REN Jian-Ye, PEI Jian-Xiang, LEI Chao   

  1. 1. Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, China University of Geosciences, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430074, China;
    3. Zhanjiang Branch, CNOOC, Zhanjiang  524057, China
  • Received:2010-04-19 Revised:2010-06-01 Online:2010-09-20 Published:2010-09-20

摘要:

在地震剖面解释的基础上,运用断层活动速率法和位移-距离法对琼东南盆地主要断裂系统的活动性进行了定量计
算。结果表明,断裂的活动性与盆地的演化阶段相对应,同时可以在同裂陷阶段划分出始新世—早渐新世裂陷幕和晚渐新
世断坳转换幕,这两幕裂陷控制了盆地深部的基本构造格局。单条断层在早渐新世至晚渐新世期间断裂主要活动中心存在
由东向西迁移的过程,盆地断裂系统活动中心在晚渐新世至早中新世也存在由东向西迁移的过程,盆地内规模较大的复合
断裂带具有区段式活动的特征。将盆地内断裂系统发育模式总结为两种:以6号和11号断裂带为代表的简单生长模型,断裂
系统发育演化过程中表现为单一区段断层独立生长的特征,断层简单地由中间向两侧生长,断层位移距离曲线自始至终为
半椭圆型,且最大位移大致位于断层中部;以2号和5号断裂带为代表的生长连通型生长模式,断裂带由多条区段式活动的
断层生长连接形成,其生长发育过程表现为沿断层面纵向上最大滑移量由各个区段的中心向各个区段交汇处迁移,由此各
个区段断端破裂扩展,最终相互连接而形成一条大型断裂带。

关键词: 琼东南盆地, 断裂活动, 定量计算, 断层发育模式

Abstract:

Based on geological structural interpretation of 2D and 3D seismic profiles, activities of main faults in Qiongdongnan
basin (QDNB) have been studied by using throw rate plots and displacement-distance plots. The results show that fault activities
corresponded  to evolution  stages of  the basin, and  the  syn-rifting  stage of QDNB can be  further divided  into Eocene-Early
Oligocene rifting episode and Late Oligocene rift-sag  transition episode, which controlled  the structural pattern  in deep QDNB.
The center of single fault activity (such as No. 6 fault and No. 11 fault) migrated from east to west during Early Oligocene to Late
Oligocene, and  the center of  the whole  fault system  in QDNB also migrated  from east  to west during Late Oligocene  to Early
Miocene. The composite type faults, such as No. 2 fault, showed segmentation feature. The modes of fault development are of two
kinds: The non-interacting mode: the fault system grew as a single segment during its development and evolution, such as No. 6
fault and No.11  fault. In  this mode,  the  fault simply grew  from  the middle  to both sides and  it become  larger due  to systematic
increase  in both maximum displacement and  length, and  the displacement-distance plot of  the  fault  system  is  semi-elliptic
during the whole process; The interacting mode: the fault zone is composed of several segments, and its growth was mainly due to growing-connecting of  the adjacent segments. The development process of  the  fault system shows  that, along  the  fault surface  in
vertical direction, the maximum displacement migrated from each segment center to each transition position, which led to fracture
propagation of each fault segment and finally joined the separated fault segrnents together to form a fault zone.

Key words: Qiongdongnan basin, fault activity, quantitative calculation, fault growth

中图分类号: