Welcome to Geological Journal of China Universities ! Today is
Share:

Geological Journal of China Universities ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 66-75.DOI: 10.16108/j.issn1006-7493.2022099

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Progress of Methods for Assessing CO2 Mineralization Storage Potential in Basalt

GAO Zhihao1,XIA Changyou1,2,3*,LIAO Songlin1,YU Xiaojie1,LIU Muxin1,3,4,LI Pengchun1,5,LIANG Xi1,2,3,6,DAI Qing7,HUANG Xinwo7#br#   

  1. 1. Guangdong CCUS Centre, Guangzhou 510440, China;
    2. Research Institute Of Tsinghua University In Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China;
    3. China Resources Environmental Protection, China Resources Building, Shenzhen 518001, China;
    4. School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510800, China;
    5. Key Laboratory of Ocean and Marginal Sea Geology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology,
    Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China;
    6. University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom;  7. Tencent, Shenzhen 518057, China
  • Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-02-20

Abstract: CO2 geological storage is an important technology to reduce CO2 emissions, which can safely store CO2 in geological formations for millions of years. Conventional CO2 storage reservoirs include deep saline aquifers and depleted oil and gas reservoirs. Basalt is a new type of CO2 storage reservoir that has been attracting attention in recent years. CO2 storage in basalt would increase the technical method and potential of CO2 geological storage. Storage potential assessment is one of the fundamental works of CO2 geological storage study. This paper systematically examines the current methods for assessing the storage potential of CO2 in basaltic rocks, and analyzes the principles and application scenarios of various methods. Then, the study takes the basalt of Icelandic Active Rift zone as an example to compare each of the methods. The study suggests that the current CO2 mineralization storage potential assessment methods generally include three categories: ① Unit rock storage potential assessment method, which evaluates carbon sequestration potential based on the reaction volume or area of rocks; ② Mineral replacement storage potential assessment method: based on the volume of minerals that can react with CO2 in basalts. ③Pore filling storage potential assessment method, which evaluates the proportion of secondary minerals that can fill reservoirs’ pore space after CO2 mineralization. The authors note that the first method requires special experimental analysis, making it more challenging, the second method is more appropriat for basalts with high porosity and low reactive mineral content, while the third method is more suitable for basqlts with low porosity and high reactive mineral content.

Key words: basalt, CO2, geological storage, mineralization storage, storage potential, evaluation method

CLC Number: